Petites annonces | Enchères au Québec | Appel d'offres | Emplois | Circulaires | Nos Hebdos | Interurbain | Rencontre en ligne | Weblocal
Le Magazine
Entete Acceuil IDS
Envoyer ce texte à un ami Imprimer cette page Réagissez à cet article

How to detect and reject 'Gotcha journalism'

Toula Foscolos par Toula Foscolos
Voir tous les articles de Toula Foscolos
Article mis en ligne le 23 janvier 2008 à 10:51
Lisez les 4 commentaires à propos de cet article / Réagissez à cet article
How to detect and reject 'Gotcha journalism'
Everyone in Quebec's English media has been talking about Le Journal de Montréal's "investigative" story on the so-called lack of French in downtown Montreal. Most papers have covered it from the angle of language politics, but what it really reveals is a general malaise with journalism in general these days and how certain publications choose to cover a story in order to appeal to a certain type of reader.
Today, more than ever, newspapers and the media in general, are facing an ethical dilemma. On the one hand, journalism is in the business of pointing the reader's attention to what is important and why. On the other hand, tabloid journalism has invaded regular news to such an extent that even reputable news sources are starting to resemble entertainment shows (anyone seen the news on Fox lately?)

Just like human beings have a propensity for sugar and fat, so do they for media fluff, scandals and sensationalistic headlines. "Sorry, I don't speak French" splashed across the front page of a daily French paper, whose readership, to put it mildly, isn't exactly part of the Quebec intelligentsia and has a serious linguistic chip on their shoulder about anything having to do with a potential –real or otherwise- threat to their mother tongue, is sure to attract more attention than a boring old headline about how French is thriving in this province.

Sadly, these days, because the front pages are so often devoted to fluff stories, scandals, celebrity sightings or fearmongering, we confuse what’s important.

The MTV generation has neither the interest nor the patience for political discourse and in-depth analysis of issues, so the media, in an attempt to capture and retain their interest, responds with "gotcha" stories. Sensationalistic and inflammatory by nature, their intent is to provoke, tantalize, frighten, shock and awe. Who cares if they never get around to disseminating any objective information?

The newspaper business is an interesting one. On the one hand, it must be profitable to remain in existence, so managerial decisions are taken daily by publishers to ensure that viability. On the other hand, journalists have a sacred trust and responsibility towards their readership. Ultimately, their loyalty --even more so than to the company that signs their paycheque-- lies with their readers. That trust can't afford to be broken.

One of the most stringent codes of journalistic conduct is reporting without bias. "Gotcha journalism", the deliberate manipulation of the presentation of facts in order to portray a person or organization (or in this case, downtown Montreal's linguistic reality) in a way that varies from an accurate or balanced review of the facts, is highly unethical because it's deliberately biased reporting.

This is why media education is vital for newspaper readers and media watchers. People need to learn to approach news with a discerning and probing mind. Media education isn't about having the right answers, but about having the selective reasoning required to ask the right questions or at least question the questions being asked.

American TV journalist, Sam Donaldson, once remarked that "if you send me to cover a pie-baking contest on Mother's Day, I'd ask dear old Mom why she used artificial sweetener or stole the apples!" As tempting (and as lazy) as it might be, one shouldn't simply make up a sensationalistic story just to appeal to those who have an appetite for one. Sometimes (what a novelty!) your job should consist of nothing more than covering the pie-baking contest.

Ces articles pourraient également vous intéresser

Vos commentaires

Nom complet:
(requis)


Adresse courriel:


Vos commentaires :
(requis)


Svp inscrire le mot affiché ci-dessus Impossible de lire le mot?

Svp inscrire le mot affiché ci-dessus:


Steve Hartwell

Commentaire mis en ligne le 15 mars 2008
So true. The websites and forums for journalists are full of debate and articles about this ever growing problem. What is also a problem are those who are not even allowed to contribute their opinions, like tobacco smokers. One NEVER sees the opinions of tobacco smokers in the mainstream news, and it's not for lack of trying very hard to get reported. Democracy is a pain, because it is for everybody. Refusing to allow a group to have it's equal say in a Democracy, means there will soon be none for anybody.

Kevin Mulvina

Commentaire mis en ligne le 15 mars 2008
Stephan Dion stated passionately [or as well as he could, lol] this week "we need to put a price on carbon" falling into his promotional sales pitch, industries will be charged for that production. It doesn't take a lot of imagination to understand; the Industries involved will simply double the cost and pass it along to consumers, with a further insult of more GST.

What Global warming truly means from a politician's gaze is an excellent opportunity to introduce a large back door taxation, while promoting an alarming rise in poverty rates. Dion stands proud in his accomplishments, while smiling sheepishly before the cheering crowds.

One has to note if we know who are causing pollution, why not regulate them out of the practice? Through competition grows cost efficiencies. Punishing their customers first, is a knee jerk reaction the Journalistic accountants now seem to demand.

Are we resigned to governments and political corrections, limited to the rules of a balance sheet mindset? Or one weighted by the values of management as determined in the stick market?

Is there any room left in all of this intelligence and civility, for the limiting emotions which should keep governments and "Professionals" in check, such as shame, empathy and guilt.

Those measures should be assessed by unbiased Journalists, who keep score and report the damages without involvement, in the act of creating the "right headed" news.

Vince Harden

Commentaire mis en ligne le 15 mars 2008
Excellent article.The greatest current bias in reporting today is medical reporting.This is also the main reason that the media has been termed a health risk.Often a reporter will "spice up" a study,usually by giving it a "the sky is falling" spin.However,when someone takes the time to actually read the study,the authors have said no such thing.

The worst examples of this bias is reporting on secondhand smoke.First the reporters do not check to find if the claim being made can be supported using epidemiology.Many,including the USSG,say it cannot.The reporter doesn't even use common sense.Often,if the claim was accurate,the reporter should probably be dead.Many reporters also ignore,or do not check to find,the preponderance of the evidence which states the opposite.Usually this comes from the same organizations. (like the World Health Org.)

The Canadian Community Newspapers Association and the Canadian Newspapers Association are hosting a Newspapers Trade Conference in Toronto May 7-9,2008.This,and all,newspapers have an opportunity to correct this bias here.(if not before)



Kevin Mulvina

Commentaire mis en ligne le 15 mars 2008
The points are well made the problem is compounded unfortunately by editors who are so joined at the hip with the sales department comments and letters are so rarely seen which do not align well with the fear campaigns being protected. If the odd complaint is heard it is always followed by a counter argument or two which serve the notion having the last say is always indication of victory in a debate even if it truly was never allowed to happen.

I would find it a testament to Journalistic integrity to see even a couple of Writers in Canada standing against the World Health Organizations daily blast of fear and smear. They call it HIA Health intervention and if investigated we could easily see in the many public documents available, it is an undermining process to coerce decision makers to make the “Right headed” choices. The problem being the industrial partnerships involved leave us little confidence the protections they demand will offer us more security when more often than not, they simply offer us more costs and divisions within communities. While denormalizing anyone who dares to argue against the principles of right headed witch hunts. Global warming, Bicycle helmets, the fat pandemic and who could possibly argue against punishing smokers in any way we can. They must all be taught to act as we demand and fear what we tell them to fear.

The smoking debate is a prime example of a right headed campaign gone terribly wrong. The increased violence we see in reaction to government sanctioned hatred, is evident in every municipality the fear mongers have taught people by journalism; they should be ducking and running in fear every time someone lights a cigarette. Although the increased violence in reaction to what I see is no different than yelling fire in a theatre has had it's predictable effects in the many confrontations, by those who believe they are protecting their own health and those who don't move easily when our motivation to do so, is so obviously created science to suit a campaign goal.

What Journalism used to mean, in a Canada so proud of them, was a method by which we take out the trash. With reduced numbers of real writers falling prey, to the more profitable parroting of party lines, we have lost that confidence the news is a protection, in the growing expectation we can now rely on the news to spice up a dull day, however as the sameness of political parties drawn to poll sitting and centrist politics, created the belief it doesn't matter who you vote for anymore. We have come to adapt another foresight more evident by the day, in the belief you can't believe anything you read in the press any more as well.

Chez nos voisins


La question du net

  • L'armée canadienne devrait-elle se retirer de l'Afghanistan?
  • Oui
  • Non

Liens