Petites annonces | Enchères au Québec | Appel d'offres | Emplois | Circulaires | Nos Hebdos | Interurbain | Rencontre en ligne
Transcontinental
Le Magazine
Entete Acceuil IDS
Envoyer ce texte à un ami Imprimer cette page Réagissez à cet article

Sewage leak a black eye for the Island

Toula Foscolos par Toula Foscolos
Voir tous les articles de Toula Foscolos
Article mis en ligne le 14 août 2007 à 16:08
Soyez le premier à commenter cet article
Sewage leak a black eye for the Island
It's ironic that Verdun claims to be respectful of nature, all the while allowing raw sewage to be dumped in the St. Lawrence.
Sewage leak a black eye for the Island
Nuns' Island was the talk of the town last week and I wish it were for a better reason than being used as an exempli gratia of the embarrassing kind, by local media. Alas, the Island's 15 minutes of fame were due to 48 faulty sewer connections, found to be dumping raw sewage into the St. Lawrence River.
The nausea-inducing news preceded the torrential downpour last Monday that forced the Lachine Canal to close down Tuesday after the city was forced to dump raw sewage into the canal to avoid sewer backups.

I paddle in the canal on a daily basis. It's bad enough that, given the area's past industrial contamination, my teammates and I joke about how, any day now, we're probably going to start glowing in the dark, I now had to be reminded, in gag-inducing detail no less, about high levels of fecal coli forms floating in the waters of the St. Lawrence, near Nuns' Island. Lovely…

While they tell us the unacceptable pollution is limited to the immediate area where raw sewage is being dumped, that does little to assuage the "icky" factor. Let's face it; who wants to be swimming, fishing or even sunbathing, near water where human s$%*, pee and tampons are happily floating by? It may indeed be a drop in the ocean, figuratively speaking, but it's still a drop of fecal matter! Call me crazy, but I don't want that water touching my skin.

On a comical side note, the very same day the news broke out, one of my friends e-mailed me enthusiastically about the Comité citoyen Montréal baignade and their annual Grand Splash event; where Montrealers happily splash away in the Old Port waters, as they push for more access to the St. Lawrence. My friend couldn't wait to go swimming in the river! Being the kill-joy that I am, I promptly told her of the press conference that had taken place that morning in Verdun and the reason why I didn't feel any immediate desire to frolic in the waters of the St. Lawrence. Having squashed her "joie de vivre", she grudgingly inquired as to whether my next move involved me kicking a puppy. I assured her it did not, but she remained unconvinced.

The water quality around the island of Montreal is the best it's been in over 20 years, thanks, in no small part, to gargantuan efforts made by the City to improve its sewer treatment infrastructure. The borough should have jumped at the opportunity to rectify the sewage leak; not try to downplay it. This wasn't the time to be conducting a witch hunt, to find out who (the home owners, developers, the borough) is ultimately responsible for the repair bill. This was the time for action. The sewage leak should have been taken care of a.s.a.p.; no matter what the cost, no matter whose responsibility.

I can't help but feel that the Verdun borough missed a wonderful opportunity to act quickly and prove that they really are respectueux de nature", as they claim on their billboards. As complex as the situation might be, things could have been handled much better -- and much quicker.

Ces articles pourraient également vous intéresser

Vos commentaires

Nom complet:
(requis)


Adresse courriel:


Vos commentaires :
(requis)


Svp inscrire le mot affiché ci-dessus Impossible de lire le mot?

Svp inscrire le mot affiché ci-dessus:


Chez nos voisins


La question du net

  • Événements à Montréal-Nord : la police est-elle à blâmer ?
  • Oui
  • Non

Liens